Articles
DOI DOI: 10.67942/ijcer.2026.13.3.1058

Ecological Citizenship and Environmental Participation among Pre-Service Teachers: An Explanatory Sequential Mixed Methods Study

Dilan Kuruyer1, Esen Durmuş1
  1. 1 Fırat University, Faculty of Education, Department of Social Sciences Education, Elazığ, Türkiye

Abstract

The growing environmental challenges have increased the importance of environmental responsibility and active participation in addressing environmental issues. Therefore, it is crucial to determine the levels of ecological citizenship among pre-service teachers, who play a significant role in shaping future generations’ environmental awareness and behaviors. The purpose of this study is to determine the levels of ecological citizenship among pre-service teachers and to examine the factors influencing these levels. The study was conducted using a mixed-methods approach following an explanatory sequential design. The quantitative component drew on data from 978 pre-service teachers enrolled in science, primary school, and social studies teacher education programs in the 2022–2023 academic year, while the qualitative component was based on interviews with 13 pre-service teachers. Descriptive statistics were employed to analyze the quantitative data, whereas the qualitative data were examined through content analysis. The results of the study revealed that the pre-service teachers’ levels of ecological citizenship were moderate. Upon examining the sub-dimensions, it was observed that the participation dimension was at a lower level compared to the other dimensions. Furthermore, no significant differences were found in the overall ecological citizenship levels of the pre-service teachers according to gender, department, or university. However, statistically significant differences with small effect sizes were identified in some sub-dimensions according to gender and department, while no significant differences were observed in the sub-dimensions according to the university variable. Qualitative findings provided further explanations for the relatively low participation dimension, revealing that although pre-service teachers possessed environmental awareness and a sense of responsibility, they struggled to translate this awareness into action. In particular, an inability to break habits and a consumption-oriented lifestyle emerged as key factors limiting ecological citizenship behaviors. Furthermore, a lack of environmental awareness and insufficient interest in environmental issues were among the primary factors negatively affecting the pre-service teachers’ levels of environmental participation.

How to Cite

Kuruyer, D., & Durmuş, E. (2026). Ecological Citizenship and Environmental Participation among Pre-Service Teachers: An Explanatory Sequential Mixed Methods Study. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 13(3), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.67942/ijcer.2026.13.3.1058
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX

References

  1. Acar, H. (2021). Sosyal bilgiler öğretmen adaylarına yönelik sürdürülebilir kalkınma eğitimi önerisi (Unpublished master’s thesis). Akdeniz University, Institute of Educational Sciences.
  2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  3. Akdeniz, Ş. N., & Durmaz, A. (2024). Sosyal bilgiler öğretmen adaylarının ekolojik vatandaşlık düzeylerinin farklı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, 14(4), 2314–2326. https://doi.org/10.30783/nevsosbilen.1519439
  4. Aksüt, S. (2026). Sosyal bilgiler öğretmen adaylarının görüşleri çerçevesinde ekolojik vatandaşlık ve ekolojik vatandaşlık eğitiminin incelenmesi. Firat University Journal of Social Sciences, 36(2), 671-686. https://doi.org/10.18069/firatsbed.1641137
  5. Altın, M., & Akcanca, N. (2023). Öğrencilerin çevre eğitimine dair öz-yeterlikleri ve çevre etiği farkındalık algılarıyla ekolojik vatandaşlıklarının ilişkisi. Gazi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(2), 179–197. https://dx.doi.org/10.30855/gjes.2023.09.02.003
  6. Anantharaman, M. (2014). Networked ecological citizenship, the new middle classes and the provisioning of sustainable waste management in Bangolere, Indıa. Journal of Cleaner Production, 63, 173-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.041
  7. Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), 14-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002
  8. Bamberg, S., Rees, J., & Seebauer, S. (2015). Collective climate action: Determinants of participation intention in community-based pro-environmental initiatives. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 155-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.06.006
  9. Bell, D. R. (2005). Liberal environmental citizenship. Environmental politics, 14(2), 179-194. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010500054863
  10. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2018). Eğitimde bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (25. baskı). Pegem Akademi.
  11. Christoff, P. (1996). Ecological citizens and ecologically guided democracy. B. Doherty & M. de Geus (Eds.), In Democracy and green political thought: Sustainability, rights and citizenship (pp. 149–166). Routledge.
  12. Clayton, S., Czellar, S., Nartova-Bochaver, S., Skibins, J. C., Salazar, G., Tseng, Y.-C., Irkhin, B., & Monge-Rodriguez, F. S. (2021). Cross-Cultural validation of a revised environmental identity scale. Sustainability, 13(4), 2387. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042387
  13. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
  14. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2021). Eğitimde araştırma yöntemleri. Pegem Akademi.
  15. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Karma yöntem araştırmaları: Tasarımı ve yürütülmesi (Y. Dede & S. B. Demir, Çev. Eds.). Anı Yayıncılık.
  16. Curtin, D. (1999). Chinnagounder’s challenge: The question of ecological citizenship. Indiana University Press.
  17. Çiçek, D., Gülenç, S., & Korkmaz, E. (2024, December 31). Determining the ecological citizenship levels of tourism students: The case of Eskişehir, Turkey. Journal of Tourism, Sustainability and Well-Being, 12(4), 353–371. https://doi.org/10.34623/a4cq-pb04
  18. Dallı, C. (2024). Sosyal bilgiler dersini öğretmen adaylarının ekolojik vatandaşlığı bağlamında değerlendirmek: Bir gömülü teori çalışması (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Gazi University, Institute of Educational Sciences.
  19. Dobson, A. (2003). Citizenship and the Environment. Oxford University Press.
  20. Durgun, G. (2022). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının çevre etiği yaklaşımları ile ekolojik vatandaşlık düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Fırat Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Elazığ.
  21. Ercan, A., & Palaz, T. (2025). Sosyal bilgiler öğretmenlerinin ekolojik vatandaşlık düzeyleri ile ekolojik ayak izleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 45(2), 665-687. https://doi.org/10.17152/gefad.1741587
  22. Erşan, Ş., & Öner, S. (2022). Attitudes and opinions of preschool teacher candidates on environmental awareness. International Journal of Education Technology and Scientific Researches, 7(19), 1718–1746. http://dx.doi.org/10.35826/ijetsar.503
  23. European Network for Environmental Citizenship – ENEC (2018). Defining “Education for Environmental Citizenship”. Retrieved from https://enec-cost.eu/our-approach/education-for-environmental-citizenship/
  24. Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—Principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48, 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117
  25. Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4thed.). Sage Publications.
  26. George, D., & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 17.0 update (10th ed.). Pearson Education.
  27. Görmez, K. (1991). Türkiye’de çevre politikaları. Gazi Büro Yayınları.
  28. Green, C., Medina-Jerez, W., & Bryant, C. (2016). Cultivating environmental citizenship in teacher education. Teaching Education, 27(2), 117-135.
  29. Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59-82.
  30. Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1987). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. The Journal of environmental education, 18(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1987.9943482
  31. Horton, D. (2005). Environmental citizenship. A. Dobson & D. Bell (Eds.), In A study of everyday life among green activists (pp. 127-151). The MIT Press.
  32. Jagers, S. C., Martinsson, J., & Matti, S. (2014). Ecological citizenship: A driver of pro-environmental behaviour? Environmental Politics, 23(3), 434–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2013.835202
  33. Karaman, B., Gülersoy, A. E., & Damarseçkin, Ş. (2024). Examination of the ecological citizenship levels of teacher candidates according to various variables. Pedagogical Perspective, 3(2), 148–171. https://doi.org/10.29329/pedper.2024.61
  34. Karatekin, K. (2019). Model review Related to the effects of teachers’ levels of ecological citizenship. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, 9(1), 46-61.
  35. Karatekin, K., & Uysal, C. (2018). Ecological citizenship scale development study. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, 8(2), 82–104.
  36. Karatekin, K., Salman, M., & Uysal, C. (2019). Öğretmen adaylarının ekolojik vatandaşlık düzeylerinin karşılaştırılması. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 27(4), 1747-1756. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.3295
  37. Kaya Aydın, M. (2022). Okul öncesi öğretmenlerinin çevre okuryazarlığı ile ekolojik vatandaşlık düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi (Unpublished master’s thesis). Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University, Graduate School of Education.
  38. Kınacı, M.K., & Durmuş, E. (2025). Çevre eğitimi: Sürdürülebilir bir gelecek için. Pegem Akademi.
  39. Koca, G., & Çobanoğlu, E. O. (2024). Activities and opinions of science teacher candidates on ecological citizenship. Anadolu University Journal of Education Faculty (AUJEF), 8(3), 1000–1024. https://doi.org/10.34056/aujef.1290208
  40. Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401
  41. Light, A. (2006). Ecological citizenship: The democratic promise of restoration. H. R. Platt (Ed.), In The humane metropolis: People and nature in the 21st-century city (pp. 169–182). University of Massachusetts Press.
  42. Lummis, G. W., Morris, J. E., Lock, G., & Odgaard, J. (2017). The influence of ecological citizenship and political solidarity on Western Australian student teachers’ perceptions of sustainability issues. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 26(2), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2016.1235359
  43. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2023). Nitel veri analizi (S. Akbaba Altun & A. Ersoy, Çev. Eds.). Pegem Akademi.
  44. Mkumbachi, R. L., Astina, I. K., & Handoyo, B. (2020). Environmental awareness and pro-environmental behavior: A case of university students in Malang city. Jurnal Pendidikan Geografi: Kajian, Teori, dan Praktek dalam Bidang Pendidikan dan Ilmu Geografi, 25(2), 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um017v25i22020p161
  45. Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric theory (1st ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  46. Özdemir, O. (2022b). Sürdürülebilir okuryazarlık ve çevre eğitimi. Pegem Akademi.
  47. Pallett, H. (2017). Environmental citizenship. R. Douglas, N. Castree, M. F. Goodchild, A. Kobayashi, W. Liu & R. A. Marston (Eds.), In The International encyclopedia of geography: People, the Earth, environment, and technology (pp. 1-10). Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg0474
  48. Parra, G., Hansmann, R., Hadjichambis, A. C., Goldman, D., Paraskeva-Hadjichambi, D., Sund, P., ... & Conti, D. (2020). Education for environmental citizenship and education for sustainability. A. Ch. Hadjichambis, P. Reis, D. Paraskeva-Hadjichambi, J. Činčera, J. Boeve-de Pauw, N. Gericke, M. C. Knippels (Eds.), In Conceptualizing environmental citizenship for 21st century education (pp. 149-160). Environmental Discourses in Science Education 4. Springer, Cham.
  49. Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529682571
  50. Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A Value-Belief-Norm Theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6(2), 81–97. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24707060
  51. Šulc, I., Morgado, S., Đorđević, Z., Gašparović, S., Radović, V., & Keranova, D. (2020). Societal issues and environmental citizenship. A. Ch. Hadjichambis, P. Reis, D. Paraskeva-Hadjichambi, J. Činčera, J. Boeve-de Pauw, N. Gericke, & M. C. Knippels (Eds.), In Conceptualizing environmental citizenship for 21st century education (pp. 49–66). Environmental Discourses in Science Education 4. Springer, Cham.
  52. Teksöz, G. (2014). Geçmişten ders almak: Sürdürülebilir kalkınma için eğitim. Bogazici University Journal of Education, 31(2), 73-97.
  53. Tıraş, H. H. (2012). Sürdürülebilir kalkınma ve çevre: Teorik bir İnceleme. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(2), 57-73.
  54. Tunç, B., & Yücedağlar, A. (2024). Bir eşitlik vaadi: Ekolojik vatandaşlık eğitimi. G. Özdem, T. Bülbül, B. Tunç, & E. Ö. Özbal (Eds.), Eğitim ekonomisi ve planlaması: Prof. Dr. Kasım Karakütük’e bilim adamı olarak adanmış 40 yıla armağan içinde (ss. 249-267). Ankara Üniversitesi Yayınları No: 886.
  55. UNESCO. (1977). Intergovernmental Conference on Environmental Education Tbilisi. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000032763?posInSet=3&queryId=30a3b390-7746-4c54-8b52-d10446db5feb
  56. United Nations (UN). (1972). The documents of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment (Stockholm, 5-16 June 1972). Retrieved from https://docs.un.org/en/A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1
  57. United Nations (UN). (1992). Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (Rio de Janeiro, 3-14 June 1992). Retrieved from https://globalforestcoalition.org/wpcontent/uploads/2010/12/Rio-Declaration-on-Environment-and-Developmentprinciples1.pdf
  58. Uysal, C. (2018). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının ekolojik vatandaşlık düzeylerinin belirlenmesi (Unpublished master’s thesis). Kastamonu University, Institute of Social Sciences.
  59. Uysal, C., & Karatekin, K. (2022). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının ekolojik vatandaşlık düzeylerinin belirlenmesi. Türkiye Bilimsel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 7(2), 371–392.
  60. Ünal, E. (2019). The investigation of ecological citizenship levels of teacher candidates. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 5(2), 329–334. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.522.2019.52.329.334
  61. Ünal, S., & Dımışkı, E. (1999). UNESCO-UNEP himayesinde çevre eğitiminin gelişimi ve Türkiye’de ortaöğretim çevre eğitimi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(17), 142-154.
  62. Van Zomeren, M., Saguy, T., & Schellhaas, F. M. (2013). Believing in “making a difference” to collective efforts: Participative efficacy beliefs as a unique predictor of collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16(5), 618-634. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430212467476
  63. Yılmaz, M., Karakaya, F., Çimen, O., & Adıgüzel, M. (2019). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının ekolojik vatandaşlık düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(30), 98–113. https://doi.org/10.29329/mjer.2019.218.6
  64. Yurttaş, A., Erdaş Kartal, E., Çağlar, A., & Yurttaş, A. (2021). Temel eğitimde görev yapan öğretmenlerin ekolojik vatandaşlık düzeylerinin incelenmesi. International Social Sciences Studies Journal, 7(85), 2905–2916. https://doi.org/10.26449/sssj.3233
  65. Yüksel, A., & Barut, D. (2023). Uluslararası çevre hukukunda sürdürülebilir kalkınma. Çevre Şehir ve İklim Dergisi, 2(3), 32-58.