A Longitudinal Study of the Relationship between Mathematics and Science Scores: The Case of Texas
Abstract views: 53
/ 
PDF downloads: 40
Keywords:
Integration, Interdisciplinary, Mathematics, ScienceAbstract
The relationship between mathematics and science is generally validated by common sense. There is a need to empirically show how student growth is affected as students transition to high school when a profound mathematical knowledge is no longer an option for success in science but is required. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between mathematics and science scores acquired from a state-wide student achievement exam in Texas, USA, and how this relationship changes over the high school years. Results over four time points in mathematics and two time points in science, spanning 8th to 11th grades, showed a greater growth in mathematics than it did for science and a weaker correlation between the two content areas for under-represented ethnicities.
References
Akatugba, A. H., & Wallace, J. (1999). Sociocultural influences on physics students’ use of proportional reasoning in a non-western country. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 3, 305-320.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Barnett, J., & Hodson, D. (2001). Pedagogical context knowledge: Toward a fuller understanding of what good science teachers know. Science Education, 85, 426-453.
Barrett, P. (2007). Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit. Personality and Individual differences, 42(5), 815-824.
Berlin, D. F. (1992). A network for integrated science and mathematics teaching and learning. School and Science Mathematics, 92, 340-342.
Berlin D. F., & Lee, H. (2005). Integrating science and mathematics: Historical analysis. School Science and Mathematics, 105(1), 15-24.
Berlin, D. F., & White, A. L. (1995). Connecting school science and mathematics. In P. A. House, & A. F. Coxford (Eds.), Connecting mathematics across the curriculum: 1995 yearbook of the National
Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 22-33). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Corlu, M. A., & Corlu, M. S. (2012). Scientific inquiry based professional development models in teacher education. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 12(1), 514–521.
Cosentino, C. (2008). The impact of integrated programming on student attitude and achievement in grade 9 academic mathematics and science (Master’s thesis, Brock University, Ontario, Canada). Retrieved from http://dr.library.brocku.ca/handle/10464/2829.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Czerniak, M. C., Weber, B. W., Sandman, A., Jr., & Ahern, J. (1999). A literature review of science and mathematics integration. School Science and Mathematics, 99, 421-430.
Frykholm, J., & Glasson, G. (2005). Connecting science and mathematics instruction: Pedagogical context knowledge for teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 105, 127-141.
George, P. S. (1996). The integrated curriculum: A reality check. Middle School Journal, 28, 12-19.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
Hurley, M. M. (2001). Reviewing integrated science and mathematics: The search for evidence and definitions from new perspectives. School Science and Mathematics, 101, 259-268.
Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., & Lamon, S. J. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance: A metaanalysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 139.
Judson, E., & Sawada, D. (2000). Examining the effects of a reformed junior high school science class on students’ mathematics achievement. School Science and Mathematics, 100, 419-425.
Lee, O., & Fradd, S. H. (1998). Science for all: Including students from non-English language backgrounds. Educational Researcher, 27, 12-21.
Lee, O., Fradd, S. H., & Sutman, F. X. (1995). Science knowledge and cognitive strategy use among culturally and linguistically diverse students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 797-816.
Mason, T. C. (1996). Integrated curricula: Potential and problems. Journal of Teacher Education. 47, 263-270.
McBride, J. W., & Silverman, F. L. (1991). Integrating elementary/middle school science and mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 91, 285-292.
Meier, S. L., Nicol, M., & Cobbs, G. (1998). Potential benefits and barriers to integration. School Science and Mathematics, 98, 438-447.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2001). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Offer, J., & Mireles, S. V. (2009). Mix it up: Teachers’ beliefs on mixing mathematics and science. School Science and Mathematics, 10, 146-152.
Park Rogers, M. A., Volkmann, M. J., & Abell, S. K. (2007). Perspectives: Science and mathematics: A natural connection. Science and Children, 45(2), 60-61.
Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., Cogan L. S., Jakwerth, P. M., & Houang, R. T. (1999). Facing the consequences: Using TIMSS for a closer look at U.S. mathematics and science education. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Stinson, K., Harkness, S. S., Meyer, H., & Stallworth, J. (2009). Mathematics and science integration models and characterizations. School Science and Mathematics, 109, 153-161.
Texas student assessment program (Technical digest for the academic year 2006-2007). (2007). Retrieved from. Texas Education Agency: http://www.tea.state.tx.us/
Texas student assessment program (Technical digest for the academic year 2007-2008). (2008). Retrieved from Texas Education Agency: http://www.tea.state.tx.us/
Westby, C. E., & Velasquez, D. (2000). Developing scientific literacy: A sociocultural approach. Remedial and Special Education, 21, 101-110.
Wright, M., & Chorin, A. (1999). Mathematics and science. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
Yates, J. R., & Ortiz, A. A. (1998). Developing individualized education programs for exceptional language minority students. In L. M. Baca & H. T. Cervantes (Eds.), The bilingual special education interface (3rd ed., pp. 188-212). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Sevket Ceyhun Cetin, M. Sencer Corlu, Mary M. Capraro, Robert M. Capraro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
