Effects of Reciprocal Teaching on EFL Fifth Graders' English Reading Ability


Abstract views: 31 / PDF downloads: 27

Authors

  • Teng-lung Peng
  • Shu-hui Wang

Keywords:

Reciprocal Teaching, EFL, Word recognition tests, Reading comprehension tests

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effects of Reciprocal Teaching on EFL fifth graders’ reading ability, in terms of word recognition and reading comprehension in an elementary school in Taiwan. The participants in this research were fifty-three fifth-graders of an elementary school, 25 males and 28 females, in two intact classes in Taiwan. Students in one fifth-grade class, the control group, received regular English instruction, while those in the other fifth-grade class, the experimental group, received reciprocal teaching program, in two-hour English classes per week for 12 weeks, the duration of this study. Pretest-posttest of word recognition tests and reading comprehension tests were applied to evaluate students’ progress of reading ability before and after reciprocal teaching program. Six students were interviewed after the program, and students’ attitudes toward reciprocal teaching in English reading were recorded. The research results indicated that most students made prominent improvement in their English reading ability, word recognition, and reading comprehension. In addition, most participants had positive attitude toward reciprocal teaching, and they liked reciprocal teaching to be incorporated into English classes. Finally, based on the findings, some implications are also proposed to be of help to those who are English teachers or educational practitioners in elementary schools.

Author Biographies

Teng-lung Peng

Corresponding Author: Teng-lung Peng, antern.perng@gmail.com, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology

Shu-hui Wang

National Yunlin University of Science and Technology

References

Alfassi, M. (1998). Reading for meaning: The efficacy of reciprocal teaching in fostering reading comprehension in high school students in remedial reading class. American Educational Research Journal, 35 (2), 309-332.

Berg, B. L. (2007). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Chen, T. C. (2002). The development of English reading diagnostic test for junior high school students. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Changhua University of Education, Taiwan.

Duffy, G. G., & Roehler, L. R. (1987). Improving reading instruction through the use of responsive elaboration. The Reading Teacher, 40 (6), 514-519.

Fevre, D. M. L., Moore, D. W., & Wilkinson, I. A. G. (2003). Tape-assisted reciprocal teaching: Cognitive bootstrapping for poor decoders. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73 (1), 37-58. doi:10.1348/000709903762869905

Fielding, L., & Roller, C. (1992). Making difficult books accessible and easy books acceptable. The Reading Teacher, 45 (9), 678-685.

Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2009). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (9th). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Hong, Y. L., Huang, H. S., Lin, C. R., Chou, Y. L., Liou, Y.-M., & Hsie, L. H. (2006). The development of the Englsih word recognition test for junior high and elementary school students. Psychological Testing, 53 (2), 155-180.

Jenkins, J. R., Stein, M. L., & Wysocki, K. (1984). Learning vocabulary through reading. American Educational Research Journal, 21 (4), 767-787.

Ministry of Education. (2008). Guidelines of English curriculum of grade 1st-9th. Taiwan: MOE.

Myers, P. A. (2006). The princess storyteller, clara clarifier, quincy questioner, and the wizard: Reciprocal teaching adapted for kindergarten students. The Reading Teacher, 59 (4), 314-324.

Neuman, W. L. (2006). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

Oczkus, L. D. (2003). Reciprocal teaching at work: Strategies for improving reading comprehension (2nd ed.). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension fostering and comprehension monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1 (2), 117-175. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1.

Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1986). Interactive teaching to promote independent learning from text. The Reading Teacher, 39 (8), 771-777.

Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Pilonieta, P., & Medina, A. L. (2009). Reciprocal teaching for the primary grades: We can do it, too! The Reading Teacher, 63 (2), 120-129. doi:10.1598/RT.63.2.3

Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. E. (1993, May). Reciprocal teaching: A review of 19 experimental studies (tech. rep. No. 574). Urbana, IL. Retrieved from https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/17744/ctrstreadtechrepv01993i00574_opt.pdf?sequence=1

Tutty, L. M., Rothery, M., & Grinnell, R. M. (1996). Qualitative research for social workers: Phases, steps, and tasks. London: Allyn and Bacon.

Downloads

Published

30.10.2022

How to Cite

Peng, T.- lung, & Wang, S.- hui. (2022). Effects of Reciprocal Teaching on EFL Fifth Graders’ English Reading Ability . International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 2(2), 76–88. Retrieved from https://ijcer.net/index.php/pub/article/view/33

Issue

Section

Articles