The Perceptions Of Educational Administrators Towards Digital Leadership In The Age Of Artificial Intelligence: A Qualitative Study
Abstract views: 178 / PDF downloads: 58
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52380/ijcer.2024.11.3.602Keywords:
Artificial intelligence, Virtuous leadership, EducationAbstract
Artificial intelligence technologies are used in many fields and have become a part of our lives. The field of artificial intelligence, which has an important place especially in the field of education and for the digital leadership, is constantly developing and is expected to create even greater impacts in the future. The main purpose of this research is to examine the experiences of educational administrators towards digital leadership in the age of artificial intelligence. In the research, phenomenological design, one of the qualitative research methods, was used. The research's study group was comprised of 15 educational administrators. These participants were selected using a convenience sampling design, a type of maximum sampling method, derived from purposive sampling methods. In the study, a semi-structured interview form created by the researchers by analyzing the literature in detail and taking expert opinions was used as a data collection tool. Content analysis was used to analyze the data. According to the results of the research, the themes of general perceptions of educational administrators towards artificial intelligence, perceptions towards the use of artificial intelligence in education, general perceptions of educational administrators towards digital leadership and suggestions of educational administrators towards artificial intelligence and digital leadership emerged.
References
Ahlquist, J. (2020). Digital leadership in higher education: Purposeful social media in a connected world. Routledge.
Akkaya, B., & Tabak, A. (2020). The link between organizational agility and leadership: A research in science parks. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 19(1), 1-17.
Antonopoulou, H., Halkiopoulos, C., Barlou, O., & Beligiannis, G. N. (2021). Transformational leadership and digital skills in higher education institutes: During the COVID-19 pandemic. Emerging Science Journal, 5(1), 1-15.
Antonopoulou, H., Halkiopoulos, C., Barlou, O., & Beligiannis, G. (2021). Digital leader and transformational leadership in higher education. In INTED2021 Proceedings (pp. 9616-9624).
Arslan, K. (2020). Eğitimde yapay zekâ ve uygulamaları [Artificial intelligence in education and its applications]. Batı Anadolu Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 11(1), 71-88.
Baker, T., Smith, L., & Anissa, N. (2019). Educ-AI-tion rebooted: Exploring the future of artificial intelligence in schools and colleges, 1-56.
Brock, J. K. U., & Von Wangenheim, F. (2019). Demystifying AI: What digital transformation leaders can teach you about realistic artificial intelligence. California Management Review, 61(4), 110-134.
Cameron, K. (2012). Positive leadership: Strategies for extraordinary performance. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Cojean, S., & Martin, N. (2021). Reducing the split-attention effect of subtitles during video learning: might the use of occasional keywords be an effective solution?. L'Année psychologique, 121(4), 417-442.
Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2010). The second educational revolution: Rethinking education in the age of technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 18-27.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
Delponte, L., & Tamburrini, G. (2018). European Artificial Intelligence (AI) leadership, the path for an integrated vision. European Parliament.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. sage.
Eberl, J. K., & Drews, P. (2021, March). Digital Leadership‒Mountain or molehill? A literature review. In International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik (pp. 223-237).
Erlandson, D. A. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry: A guide to methods. Sage.
European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies. (2017). Statement on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and ‘Autonomous’ Systems.
Feng, M., Heffernan, N., Collins, K., Heffernan, C., & Murphy, R. F. (2023, June). Implementing and evaluating ASSISTments online math homework support at large scale over two years: Findings and lessons learned. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 28-40). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Fitzgerald, M., Kruschwitz, N., Bonnet, D., & Welch, M. (2014). Embracing digital technology: A new strategic imperative. MIT Sloan Management Review, 55(2), 1.
Hanna, N. (2018). A role for the state in the digital age. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 7(1), 1-16.
Hesse, A. (2018, January). Digitalization and Leadership-How experienced leaders interpret daily realities in a digital world. In Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. The Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Kane, G. C., Phillips, A. N., Copulsky, J., & Andrus, G. (2019). How digital leadership is (n't) different. MIT Sloan Management Review, 60(3), 34-39.
Kirschner, P. A., Clark, R. E., & Sweller, J. (2006). Work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.
Levina, N., & Vaast, E. (2006). Turning a community into a market: A practice perspective on information technology use in boundary spanning. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(4), 13-37.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
McCarthy, J. (2004). What is artificial intelligence. http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/whatisai.html.
McCulloch, W. S., & Pitts, W. (1943). A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 5, 115-133.
Morgan, B., & Papadonikolaki, E. (2022). Digital Leadership for the Built Environment. In Industry 4.0 for the Built Environment (pp. 591-608). Springer.
Morse, J. M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. (2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International journal of qualitative methods, 1(2), 13-22.
Nambisan, S., Lyytinen, K., Majchrzak, A., & Song, M. (2017). Digital Innovation Management: Reinventing innovation management research in a digital world. MIS Quarterly, 41(1).
Neubauer, R., Tarling, A., & Wade, M. (2017). Redefining leadership for a digital age. Global Centre for Digital Business Transformation, 1-15.
Ömer, Ö. Z. (2020). Dijital liderlik: Dijital dünyada okul lideri olmak [Digital leadership: Being a school leader in the digital world]. Uluslararası Liderlik Çalışmaları Dergisi: Kuram ve Uygulama, 3(1), 45-57.
Persson, J., & Manas, K. (2021). Towards the new normal: digital transformation through digital leadership and digital transformation strategies.
Peter, M. K., Kraft, C., & Lindeque, J. (2020). Strategic action fields of digital transformation: An exploration of the strategic action fields of Swiss SMEs and large enterprises. Journal of Strategy and Management.
Popenici, S. A., & Kerr, S. (2017). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), 1-13.
Pressey, S. L. (1950). Development and appraisal of devices providing immediate automatic scoring of objective tests and concomitant self-instruction. The Journal of Psychology, 29(2), 417-447.
Promsri, C. (2019). The developing model of digital leadership for a successful digital transformation. GPH-International Journal of Business Management (IJBM), 2(08), 01-08.
Qian, X., & Papadonikolaki, E. (2021). Shifting trust in construction supply chains through blockchain technology. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 28(2), 584-602.
Roll, I., & Wylie, R. (2016). Evolution and revolution in artificial intelligence in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(2), 582-599.
Sağbaş, M., & Erdoğan, F. A. (2022). Digital leadership: A systematic conceptual literature review. İstanbul Kent Üniversitesi İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(1), 17-35.
Sainger, G. (2018). Leadership in digital age: A study on the role of leader in this era of digital transformation. International Journal on Leadership, 6(1), 1.
Schwarzmüller, T., Brosi, P., Duman, D., & Welpe, I. M. (2018). How does the digital transformation affect organizations? Key themes of change in work design and leadership. Management Revue, 29(2), 114-138.
Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77-100.
Temelkova, M. (2018). Skills for digital leadership-Prerequisite for developing high-tech economy. International Journal of Advanced Research in Management and Social Sciences, 7(12), 50-74.
Thorndike, E. (1927). L., Amer. J. Psychol, 39, 212-222.
Tigre, F. B., Curado, C., & Henriques, P. L. (2023). Digital leadership: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of leadership & organizational studies, 30(1), 40-70.
Tobias, S., & Duffy, T. M. (2009). The success or failure of constructivist instruction: An introduction. In Constructivist Instruction (pp. 15-22). Routledge.
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. John Wiley & Sons.
Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., & McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 298-318.
von Leipzig, T., Gamp, M., Manz, D., Schöttle, K., Ohlhausen, P., Oosthuizen, G., & von Leipzig, K. (2017). Initialising customer-orientated digital transformation in enterprises. Procedia Manufacturing, 8, 517-524.
Wang, Y. (2021). When artificial intelligence meets educational leaders’ data-informed decision-making: A cautionary tale. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 69, 100872.
Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in social sciences]. Seçkin Yayınevi.
Zhong, L. (2017). Indicators of digital leadership in the context of K-12 education. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange (JETDE), 10(1), 3.
Ziek, P., & Smulowitz, S. (2014). The impact of emergent virtual leadership competencies on team effectiveness. Leadership and Organization Development Journal.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 1970 Gülçin Kurkan, Prof. Dr. Münevver Çetin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.