Articles
DOI DOI: 10.52380/ijcer.2023.10.3.481

The Developing Digital Content Production Skills for Mother Tongue Teaching with Web 2.0 Tools in Teacher Education: An Action Research

Üzeyir Süğümlü1
  1. 1 Ordu University

Abstract

Today, it is widely acknowledged that the use of the Internet and the development, production, and sharing of content over the web has become widespread. Web technologies that provide these conveniences are commonly referred to as Web 2.0 tools. This study aims to develop the skills of pre-service teachers who will teach Turkish as a mother tongue to produce digital content for mother tongue teaching with Web 2.0 tools. The research was conducted with action research, one of the qualitative research methods. The participants developed their digital content production skills through the research using many different Web 2.0 tools. With these different Web 2.0 tools, the participants developed instructional content such as puzzles, online quizzes, presentations, video preparation and editing, blogs/websites, and concept maps. The various digital contents developed by the participants with different Web 2.0 tools are digital teaching materials for reading, writing, listening/watching, and speaking skills that form the basis of mother tongue teaching. The participants' thoughts about feeling inadequate about web 2.0 tools before the implementation changed after the implementation. The participants could produce content with Web 2.0 tools, improve their teaching skills, and benefit from these tools in their teaching practicum.

How to Cite

Süğümlü, Üzeyir. (2023). The Developing Digital Content Production Skills for Mother Tongue Teaching with Web 2.0 Tools in Teacher Education: An Action Research. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 10(3), 687–701. https://doi.org/10.52380/ijcer.2023.10.3.481
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX

Author Biography

Üzeyir Süğümlü, Ordu University

Ordu Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, Türkçe ve Sosyal Bilimler Eğitimi Bölümü, Türkçe Eğitimi Anabilim Dalı

References

  1. Ajjan, A., & Hartshorne, R., (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt web 2.0 technologies: theory and empirical tests. Internet and Higher Education, 11(2), 71-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.05.002
  2. Akman, E. (2022). Öğretim teknolojilerinde web araçları. K. Tekşan & Ü. Süğümlü (Eds.), Web araçları ile Türkçe öğretimi içinde (s. 1-28). Eğiten Kitap.
  3. Alexander, B. (2006). Web 2.0: A new wave of innovation for teaching and learning? Retrieved from https://members.educause.edu/bryan-alexander
  4. Almalı, H., & Yeşiltaş, E. (2020). The effect of web 2.0 technologies used teaching geography topics ın social studies education on students academic achlevement and attitudes. Turkish Scientific Researches Journal, 5(2), 165-182. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/tubad/issue/59101/828476
  5. Aytan, T., & Ayhan, N. H., (2018). Digital environments in teaching turkish as a foreign language. International Journal of Bilingualism Studies, 1, 3-37. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/38080983/T%C3%BCrk%C3%A7enin_Yabanc%C4%B1_Dil_Olarak_%C3%96%C4%9Fretiminde_Dijital_Ortamlar_Digital_Environments_in_Teaching_Turkish_as_a_Foreign_Language
  6. Bağcı Ayrancı, B., & Süğümlü, Ü. (2021). Dijital okuma. F. Susar Kırımızı (Ed.), Dijital dönüşümde Türkçe öğretimi içinde (s. 161-175). Anı Yayıncılık.
  7. Balbay, S., & Erkan, G. (2018). Perceptions of ınstructors on using web 2.0 tools in academic english courses. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 10(2), 45-60. Retrieved from https://open.metu.edu.tr/handle/11511/85949
  8. Bhattacharya, D., & Mohalik, R. (2020). Dijital mind mapping software: A new horizon in the modern teaching-learning strategy. Journal of Advances in Education and Philosophy, 4(10), 400-406. https://doi.org/10.36348/jaep.2020.v04i10.001
  9. Bozna, H., & Yüzer, T. V. (2020). Digital natives’ use of web 2.0 tools in learning foreign language: A case study. Language and Technology, (2)1, 26-43. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/lantec/issue/52176/600923
  10. Buffington, M. L. (2008). Creating and consuming web 2.0 in art education. Computers in the Schools, 25(3-4), 303-313. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380560802365898
  11. Cheung, W. S., & Hew, K. F. (2009). A review of research methodologies used in studies on mobile handheld devices in K-12 and higher education settings. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(2), 153-183. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1148
  12. Clements, J. A., & Boyle, R. (2018). Compulsive technology use: Compulsive use of mobile applications. Computers in Human Behavior, 87(2018), 34-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.018
  13. Conole, G, & Alevizou, P. (2010). A literature review of the use of web 2.0 tools in higher education. Retrieved from https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/literature-review-use-web-20-tools-higher-education
  14. Coutinho, C. P. (2008). Web 2.0 tools in pre-service teacher education programs: An example from Portugal. Retrieved from http://repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt/handle/1822/8467
  15. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research (4th Edition). Boston: Pearson Education Inc.
  16. Çelik, T. (2021). Web 2.0 araçları kullanımı yetkinliği ölçeği geliştirme çalışması. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 51, 449-478. https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.700181
  17. Derince, Z. M., & Özgen, B. (2017). Eylem araştırması. F. N. Seggie & Y. Bayyurt (Eds.). Nitel araştırma yöntem teknik ve yaklaşımları (2. Baskı) içinde (s. 146-161). Anı Yayıncılık.
  18. Elmas, R., & Geban, Ö. (2012). Web 2.0 tools for 21st century teachers. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(1), 243-254. Retrieved from https://iojes.net/?mod=tammetin&makaleadi=&makaleurl=IOJES_795.pdf&key=41244
  19. Estable, M. D. R. (2018). Implementation factors and faculty perceptions of electronic textbooks on the ipad. Open Praxis, 10(1). 41-54. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.10.1.729
  20. European Commission (2010). The future of learning: European teachers’ visions. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256461828_The_Future_of_Learning_European_Teachers'_Visions
  21. Franklin, T., & Harmelen, M. V. (2007). Web 2.0 for content for learning and teaching in higher education. Retrieved from https://www.franklin-consulting.co.uk/LinkedDocuments/Web2-Content-learning-and-teaching.pdf
  22. Girgin, E. G. (2011). A web 2.0 tool for language teaching with flash content. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 627–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2010.12.105
  23. Gursoy, G., & Goksun, D. O. (2019). The experiences of pre-service science teachers in educational content development using web 2.0 tools. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(4), 338-357. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.000000
  24. Hague, C., & Payton, S. (2010). Digital literacy across the curriculum. UK: Futurelab.
  25. Horzum, M. B. (2010). Investigating teachers’ Web 2.0 tools awareness, frequency and purposes of usage in terms of different variables. International Journal of Human Sciences, 7(1), 603-634. Retrieved from https://www.j-humansciences.com/ojs/index.php/IJHS/article/view/910/506
  26. Johnson, A. P. (2005). A short guide to action research. Boston, MA: Pearson Publishing.
  27. Joo, Y. J., Bong, M., J. B., & Choi, H. J. (2000); Self-effiacy for self-regulated learning, academic self-effiacy, and internet self-effiacy in web based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(2), 5-17. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF02313398.pdf
  28. Karakuş, N., & Er, Z. (2021). Opinions of pre-service Turkish teachers on the use of web 2.0 tools. IBAD Journal of Social Sciences, (9), 177-197. https://doi.org/10.21733/ibad.837184
  29. Karchmer-Klein, R., & Shinas, V. H. (2012). Guiding principles for supporting new literacies in your classroom. The Reading Teacher, 65(5), 288-293. https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.01044
  30. Kilmen, S. (2021). SPSS uygulamalı istatistik (4. Baskı). Anı Yayıncılık.
  31. Luo, T. (2013). Web 2.0 for language learning: Benefits and challenges for educators. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 3(3), 1-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/ijcallt.2013070101
  32. Mayer, R. E. (Ed.). (2014). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  33. Mills, G. E. (2003). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher (2nd Ed.). New Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall.
  34. Morgan, L. (2012). Generation Y, learner autonomy and the potential of Web 2.0 tools for language learning and teaching. Campus-wide information systems, 29(3), 166-176. https://doi.org/10.1108/10650741211243184
  35. Novak, J. D., & Canas, A. J. (2007). Theoretical origins of concept maps, how to construct them, and uses in education. Reflecting Education, 3(1), 29-42. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228761562_Theoretical_origins_of_concept_maps_how_to_construct_them_and_uses_in_education
  36. Ofosu, V. T., Mahama, S., Vandyck, E., Kumador, D.K., & Toku, N. (2015). Mother tongue usage in Ghanaian Pre-Schools: Perceptions of parents and teachers. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(34), 81-87. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1086075.pdf
  37. Orehovacki, T., Bubas, G., & Konecki, M. (2009). Web 2.0 in education and potential factors of Web 2.0 use by students of information systems. ITI ’09. Proceedings of the ITI 2009 31st International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces: Cavtat, Croatia. Retrieved from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5196124
  38. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD] (2009). Teacher evaluation: A conceptual framework and examples of country practices. Paris: OECD.
  39. Özdemir, O. (2021). Türkçe öğretiminde teknoloji kullanımı. E. Kolaç & S. Dal (Ed.). Etkinliklerle Türkçe öğretimi (2. baskı) içinde (s. 589-627). Nobel Akadamik.
  40. Peregoy, S., & Boyle, O. (2012). Reading, writing and learning in ESL: A resource book for teachers. New York: Allyn & Bacon.
  41. Perron, B. E., & Stearns, A. G. (2010). A review of a presentation technology: Prezi. Research on Social Work Practice, 21(3), 376–377. Retrieved from https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/78306/Prezi.pdf?seq
  42. Rani, N., Das, P., & Bhardwaj, A. K. (2022). Rumor, misinformation among web: A contemporary review of rumor detection techniques during different web waves. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 34(1). 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.6479
  43. Rich, M. (2008). Millennial students and technology choices for information searching. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 73-76. Retrieved from https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejbrm/article/view/1226/1189
  44. Robson, C. (2017). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri gerçek dünya araştırması (2. Baskı). Anı Yayıncılık.
  45. Sadaf, A., Newby, T. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2012). Exploring factors that predict preservice teachers’ ıntentions to use web 2.0 technologies using decomposed theory of planned behavior. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(2), 171-195. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ991844.pdf
  46. Shin, N. (2006). Online learner’s “flow” experience: An empirical study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37, 705-720. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00641.x
  47. Siau, K., Sheng, H., & Nah, F. F. (2006). Use of classroom response system to enhance classroominteractivity. IEEE Transactions on Education, 49(3), 398–403. Retrieved from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1668284
  48. Smaldino, S. E., Lowther, D. L., & Mims, C. (2015). Instructional technology and media for learning (12th Edition). NY: Pearson.
  49. Süğümlü, Ü. & Aslan, S. (2022). The use of web 2.0 tools in mother-tongue ınstruction: Teachers’ experiences. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 10(1), 124-137. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.10n.1p.124
  50. Süğümlü, Ü., & Tekşan, K. (2022). Yazma becerisi öğretiminde web araçlarının kullanımı. K. Tekşan & Ü. Süğümlü (Eds.), Web araçları ile Türkçe öğretimi içinde (s. 59-88). Eğiten Kitap.
  51. Tekşan, K., & Çinpolat, E. (2021). Türkiye’de ana dili öğretimi. M. Alver & Ü. Süğümlü (Ed.), Kuram ve uygulamada dünyada ana dili öğretimi içinde (s. 20-40). Anı Yayıncılık.
  52. The Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. (2017). Öğretmenlik mesleği genel yeterlikleri. Öğretmen Yetiştirme ve Geliştirme Genel Müdürlüğü. Retrieved from https://oygm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2017_12/11115355_YYRETMENLYK_MESLEYY_GENEL_YETERLYKLERY.pdf
  53. The Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. (2018). 2023 eğitim vizyonu. Retrieved from https://www.gmka.gov.tr/dokumanlar/yayinlar/2023_E%C4%9Fitim%20Vizyonu.pdf
  54. The Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. (2019). Türkçe dersi öğretim programı. Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı. Retrieved from http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/ProgramDetay.aspx?PID=663
  55. Tıraşoğlu, C. (2019). Web 2.0 tools in Turkish insrtuction of foreigners to improve vocabulary: Kahoot! example (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Akdeniz University, Antalya, Türkiye. Retrieved from https://acikbilim.yok.gov.tr/bitstream/handle/20.500.12812/40129/yokAcikBilim_10274218.pdf?sequence=-1&isAllowed=y
  56. Tu, C., Blocher, M., & Roberts, G. (2008). Constructs for Web 2.0 learning environments: A theatrical metaphor. Educational Media International, 45(4), 253-269. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980802588576
  57. Turkish Education Association (TEA). (2009). Öğretmen yeterlikleri. Turkish Education Association. Retrieved from https://www.ted.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Ogretmen_Yeterlik_Kitap.pdf
  58. UNESCO (2008). ICT competency standards for teachers. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Retrieved from https://www.unesco.org/en/digital-competencies-skills/ict-cft
  59. Wash, P. D. (2014). Taking advantage of mobile devices: Using Socrative in the classroom. Journal of Teaching and Learning With Technology, 3(1), 99–101. https://doi.org/10.14434/jotlt.v3n1.5016
  60. Yazar, İ. (2019). The importance of digital technology applications in teaching Turkish and basic language skills. The Journal of International Social Research, 12(64), 612-623. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/54004863/T%C3%BCrk%C3%A7e_%C3%96%C4%9Freti_mi_nde_Ve_Temel_Di_l_Beceri_leri_ni_n_Kazaniminda_Di_ji_tal_Teknoloji_Uygulamalarinin_Yeri_Ve_%C3%96nemi_
  61. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (9. Baskı). Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  62. Yıldırım, İ. (2020). An investigation of effect of the use of web 2.0 tools on students' academic achievement, levels of self-directed learning with technology and attitudes towards science in the interaction of light and matter unit in 7th grade (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Türkiye. Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/