Integrating "Talking Images" in Education: A Case Study
Abstract views: 48
/ 
PDF downloads: 14
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52380/ijcer.2024.11.3.695Keywords:
İnnovation, Talking İmages, Education, Multimedia, DidacticAbstract
The era of innovation in education is well underway. Effective practices demonstrate the power of technology in motivating students and improving learning outcomes. This paper examines the integration of the talking image, a new and innovative technology, into the educational process. It also sets out the methodology and the educational benefits resulting from its use. This technology combines visual and auditory elements and is an effective tool for language education, suitable for students with learning difficulties. It can be applied in various educational contexts, from science and mathematics to art, and can enrich a simple narrative or provide personalized content. This paper is a significant contribution to the field, serving as a valuable resource for educators interested in integrating cutting-edge technologies into their pedagogical practices. New research in this direction should be done on the pedagogical use of talking pictures in education and the new frameworks for their integration.
References
Anderson, T. (Ed.) (2008) The theory and practice of online learning. athabasca university press.
Armstrong, K. M., & Yetter-Vassot, C. (1994) Transforming teaching through technology, Foreign Language Annals, 27(4), 475-486.
Camillini, G., Barison, M., & Gigliotti, R. (2022). images in dialogue: how they talk and what they say. img journal, (7), 56-73.
Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2023). E-learning and the science of instruction: proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. john Wiley & sons.
Ertmer, P. A. (1999) Addressing first-and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration, Educational technology research and development, 47(4), 47-61.
Gonzalez, R. C. (2009). Digital image processing. Pearson education india.
Hamilton, E. R., Rosenberg, J. M., & Akcaoglu, M. (2016). The Substitution Augmentation Modification Modification Redefinition (SAMR) model: a critical review and suggestions for its use. TechTrends, 60(5), 433-441.
Harter, S. (1978). Effectance motivation reconsidered. Toward a developmental model. Human development, 21(1), 34-64.
Hattie, J. (2008). visible learning: a synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. routledge.
Heemskerk, I. M. C. C., Volman, M., Ten Dam, G., & Admiraal, W. (2008). Social scripts in educational technology and inclusiveness in classroom practice. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Johnson, C. I., & Mayer, R. E. (2009). Α testing effect with multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 621.
Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm? Educational technology research and development, 39, 5-14.
Kemp, N., & Grieve, R. (2014). Face-to-face or face-to-screen? Undergraduates' opinions and test performance in classroom vs. online learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1278.
Khlaisang, J., Teo, T., & Huang, F. (2021). Acceptance of a flipped smart application for learning: a study among Thai university students. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(5), 772-789.
Kuhl, J. (1992). A theory of self‐regulation: Action versus state orientation, self‐discrimination, and some applications. Applied Psychology, 41(2), 97-129.
Lai, C., Wang, Q., & Huang, X. (2022). The differential interplay of TPACK, teacher beliefs, school culture and professional development with the nature of in‐service EFL teachers' technology adoption. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(5), 1389-1411.
Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge University Press.
Li, M., & Li, B. (2024). Unravelling the dynamics of technology integration in mathematics education: A structural equation modelling analysis of TPACK components. Education and Information Technologies, 1-29.
Macedo, H. D. S., Santos, I. T. F. D., & da Silva, E. L. O. (2023). The Power of Attention: Bridging Cognitive Load, Multimedia Learning, and AI. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.06586.
Matthias, B. (2015) Talking images: exploring culture through arts-based digital storytelling.
Mayer, R. E. (2020). Multimedia Learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R.E. (2014) The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2009) Multimedia learning, Second edition, Cambridge University Press.
Mensah, F. S., & Ampadu, E. (2024). Benefits, Challenges and Opportunities of Using Computer-Assisted Instruction in Mathematics Education. IoT, AI, and ICT for Educational Applications: Technologies to Enable Education for All, 31-49.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006) Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers college record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive Multimodal Learning Environments: special issue on interactive learning environments: contemporary issues and trends. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 309-326.
Nasab, M. Z., Esmaeili, R., & Sarem, H. N. (2015). The use of teaching aids and their positive impact on student learning elementary school. International Academic Journal of Social Sciences, 2(11), 22-27.
Parkes, S., Zaka, P., & Davis, N. (2011). The first blended or hybrid online course in a New Zealand secondary school: A case study. Computers in New Zealand Schools: Learning, Teaching, Technology, 23(1), 1-30.
Peconio, G., di Furia, M., Limone, P., Fornasari, A. (2023). Concept of Quality in Online Environments: the Actual Role of Teaching and Learning Centers. Communications in Computer and Information Science. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29800-4_28
Plass, J. L., Moreno, R., & Brünken, R. (Eds.). (2010). Cognitive load theory.
Rahmawati, F., Ramadan, Z. H. (2021). Improving High-Level Thinking Skills in Students Through Powtoon-Based Animation Video Media, Journal of Education Technology, 5(4), 654. available at:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v5i4.41037
Rakes, C.R., Stites, M.L., Ronau, R.N., Bush, S.B., Fisher, M.H., Safi, F., Desai, S., Schmidt, A., Andreasen, J.B., Saderholm, J., et al. (2022). Teaching Mathematics with Technology: TPACK and Effective Teaching Practices. Education Sciences 12, 133. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020133
Rello, L., Baeza-Yates, R., Bott, S., & Saggion, H. (2013, May). simplify or help? Text simplification strategies for people with dyslexia. In Proceedings of the 10th international cross-disciplinary conference on web accessibility (pp. 1-10).
Ringstaff, C., & Kelley, L. (2002). The learning return on our educational technology investment: A review of findings from research.
Skouradaki, M., Kalogiannakis, M., & Plexousakis, D. (2013). Enhancing Learning Management Systems (LMS) with the use of Web Technologies. Διεθνές Συνέδριο για την Ανοικτή & εξ Αποστάσεως Εκπαίδευση, 7(3A).
Sofwan, M., Habibi, A., & Yaakob, M. F. M. (2023). TPACK’s Roles in Predicting Technology Integration during Teaching Practicum: Structural Equation Modeling. Education Sciences, 13(5), 448.
Sweller, J. (2023). The Development of Cognitive Load Theory: Replication Crises and Incorporation of Other Theories Can Lead to Theory Expansion. Educ Psychol Rev 35, 95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09817-2
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cognitive science, 12(2), 257-285.
Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. In Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 55, pp. 37-76). Academic Press.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms. ascd.
Wu, S. (2024). application of multimedia technology to innovative vocational education on learning satisfaction in China. 19(2), e0298861.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Eleni Mavropoulou, Marios Koutsoukos, Dimitrios Terzopoulos, Iosif Fragoulis, Andreas Oikonomou
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
