The Relationship between Teachers' Perceptions of Compliance with the Psychological Contract and School Administrators' Empowering Leadership Behaviors

Abstract views: 94 / PDF downloads: 105




Psychological contract, compliance with psychological contract, employee empowerment, empowering leadership behaviors.


The aim of this study is to examine the effect of school administrators’ empowering leadership behaviors on the psychological contract perceptions of secondary education institution (high school) teachers. The population of the study consists of 2,878 teachers who were working at 47 high schools located in central Elazığ during the 2019-2020 school year. The sample of the study consisted of 470 teachers selected from 12 schools using the stratified sampling method. Data were collected by using the "Scale for School Administrator Compliance with Psychological Contract" developed by Koçak (2016) and the “Scale for Teacher Compliance with Psychological Contract". Teacher perceptions of the level to which school administrators displayed empowering leadership behaviors were measured by using the Empowering Leadership Behaviors Scale developed by Konczak and Stelly and Trusty (2000) and adapted to Turkish by Aras (2013). It was found that teachers had high perceptions of school administrator compliance with psychological contract (SACPC) and that they also had a high level of compliance with psychological contract (STCPC). Additionally, it was found that teacher perceptions of school administrators displaying empowering leadership behaviors (OYGLD) were also high. Perceptions of teachers who had been working for 7-11 years in the same school regarding school administrator compliance with psychological contract were higher than those of teachers who had been working in the same institution for 2-6 years. Moderately positive and significant relationships were found between the Scale for School Administrator Compliance with Psychological Contract (SACPC), the Scale for Teacher Compliance with Psychological Contract (STCPC) and its subdimensions, and the Empowering Leadership Behaviors Scale (ELBS). The variables of deciding on one’s own, knowledge sharing and innovative performance did not have a significant impact.


Altındiş, S. ve Özutku, H. (2011). Psychological empowerment and factors affecting empowerment: A study in state hospitals in Turkey. Journal of Social Sciences, 13(1), pp. 162-191.

Akçakaya, M. (2010). Personnel Empowerment Methods Applied in Organizations: Personnel Empowerment in Turkish Public Administration. Black Sea Studies, 25, pp. 145-174.

Aras, G. (2013). Implementation of empowering leadership behaviors in personnel empowerment management: An example of five-star hotels in Kemer region (Unpublished master's thesis). Gümüşhane University, Institute of Social Sciences, Gümüşhane.

Argon, T. (2014). Supporting human resources in educational institutions: Teachers' views on managerial support. International Journal of Human Science, 11(2), pp. 691-729.

Argyris, C. (1960). Understanding organizational behavior. Dorsey Press: Homewood, IL.

Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2009). Scientific Research Methods (10th Edition). Pegem Akademi.

Arslantaş, C. (2007). An empirical study to determine the effect of empowering leader behavior on psychological empowerment. Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences 7(2), pp. 227-240.

Baker, T. (2009). Towards a new employment relationship model: Aligning the changing needs of individual and organization. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 30(3), pp. 197–223.

Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New Jersey: John &Wiley Sons, Inc.

Block, P. (1986). Empowered manager. Positive political skills at work. Jossey Bass Publishers: London.

Bowen, D.E. & Lawler, E.E. (1992). The empowerment of service workers: what, why, how and when. Sloan Management Review, 33(3), pp. 31-39.

Campbell, R.F., Bridges, E. M., Corbally, J. E., Nystrand, R. O.,& Ramseyer, J. A. (1971). Introduction to educational administration. Allyn and Bacon: Boston.

Can, A. (2014). Quantitative Data Analysis in Scientific Research Process with SPSS (2nd Edition).PEGEM AKADEMİ.

Cappelli, P., Bassi, L., Katz, H., Knoke, D., Osterman, P., Useem, M. (1997). Change at Work. Oxford University Press: New York.

Cerit, Y. (2007). Levels of primary school principals performing their service-oriented leadership roles. Hacettepe University Faculty of Education Journal,33,pp. 88-98.

Çavuş, M. F. (2008). Personnel empowerment: A research in manufacturing industry enterprises. Journal of Yasar University, 3(10), pp. 1287-1300.

Çelik, H. E. ve Yılmaz, V. (2013). Structural equation modeling. Anı Publishing.

Çildir, T. K. (2008). Perceptions of administrators and teachers working in Ankara primary schools on the perception of exchange theory (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ankara University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.

Çuhadar, M. T. (2005). Staff empowerment in Turkish public administration: Problems and solutions. Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences 25,pp. 1-23.

De Vos, A., Buyens, D. ve Schalk, R. (2003). Psychological contract development during organizational socialization: Adaptation to reality and the role of reciprocity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, pp. 537-559.

Demirbilek, S. (2008). The role of staff empowerment in improving the quality of working life. Journal of Business, Power, Industrial Relations and Human Resources, 10(1), pp. 47-67.

Doğan, S. (2003). Staff Empowerment (1st Edition). Human Resources Series. System Publishing

Doğan, S. ve Kılıç, S. (2007). The place and importance of staff empowerment in ensuring organizational commitment, Journal of the Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences of Erciyes University, 29, pp. 37-61.

Eren, E. (2008). Organizational behavior and management psychology. Beta Publishing.

Gebert, D., Boerner, S. , & Kearney, E. (2006). Cross functionality and ınnovation ın new product development teams: A dilemmatic structure and ıts consequences for the management of diversity. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15, pp. 431–458.

Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), pp. 161-178.

Green, S. B., Salkind, N. J. & Akey, T. M. (1997). Using SPSS for Windows:Analyzing and Understanding Data. New York: Prentice Hall.

Griffin, R. W., & Moorhead, G. (2014), Organizational behavior managing people and organizations (11th Edition). Houghton Mifflin Company: Boston, USA.

Guest, D. (2004). The psychology of the employment relationship: An analysis based on the psychological contract. Applied Psychology, 53, pp. 541-555.

Guest, D. (2006). How an evolving-psychological contract is changing workforce flexibility. R. Gandossy, E. Tucker ve N. Verma (Ed.), Workforce wake-up call: Your workforce is changing, are you? içinde (s. 87-94). USA: John Wiley & Sons.

Güneş, K. (2007). Perceptions and expectations of primary school teachers about the communication and motivation skills of school principals (The example of the European Side of Istanbul) (Unpublished master's thesis). Yeditepe University, Institute of Social Sciences, Istanbul.

Güzelce, A. (2009). Perceptions and expectations of teachers and administrators regarding decision-making processes in primary schools (Unpublished master's thesis). Maltepe University, Institute of Social Sciences, Istanbul.

Huffington, C., Cole, C. ve Brunning, H. (1997). A manual of organizational development: The psychology of change. London: Karnac Books.

Humborstad, S. I. W., Nerstad, C. G. L., & Dysvik, A. (2014). Empowering leadership, employee goal orientations and work performance: A competing hypothesis approach. Personnel Review, 43(2), pp. 246-271.

Karakaş, A. (2014). Employee empowerment, one of the ways of empowering personnel in enterprises. Dicle University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 6 (11), pp. 89-105.

Koçak, S. (2016). The Role of empowering leadership behaviors on the psychological contract in secondary Education Institutions (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Hacettepe University, Institute of Educational Sciences.

Koçak, S. ve Burgaz, B. (2017). The Role of empowering leadership behaviors on the psychological contract in secondary Education Institutions. Education and Science, 42 (191), pp. 351-369.

Koçel, T. (2007). Business management. Arikan Publishing.

Konczak, L. J., Stelly, D. J. and Trusty, M. L. (2000). Defining and measuring empowering leader behaviors: Development of an upward feedback instrument. Educational and psychological measurement, 60(2), pp. 301-313.

Kotter, J. (1973). The psychological contract: managing the joining-up process. California Management Review, 15(9), pp. 91- 99.

Krejcie, R. V. & Morgan, D. W. (1970).Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and psychological measurement. 30, pp. 607-610.

Kun, Q., Hai-yan, S. ve Lin-li, L. (2007). The effect of empowerment on employees' organizational commitment: Psychological contract as mediator. International Conference on Management Science & Engineering, China.

Levinson, H., Price, C., Munden, K., Mandl, H. & Solley, C. (1962). Men, management and mental health. Harward University Press: Cambridge, M.A.

Lincoln, N., D., Travers, C., Ackers, P. & Wilkinson, A. (2002). The meaning of empowerment: The ınterdisciplinary etymology of a new management concept. International Journal of Management Reviews, (4)3, pp. 271-290.

Luthans, F. (2011). Organizational behavior. McGraw-Hill Irvin: New York.

Mao, H., Lıu, X., Ge, H. (2008). Evading tactics of psychological contract violations. Asian Social Science, 4 (11), pp. 26-29.

Mıhçıoğlu, C. (1983). Participation in management in Turkey. Erişim tarihi: 23.04.2020

Özdemir, M. (2011). A science at the intersection of public administration and business administration: Educational administration. Journal of Public Administration, 44(2), pp. 29-42.

Özdemir, M. (2014). Human resource management in educational organizations: Theory, application, technique. Anı Publishing.

Özdemir, M. ve Demircioğlu, E. (2015). The relationship between counterproductive work behaviours and psychological contracts in public high schools. Journal of Çukurova University Faculty of Education, 45(1), pp. 41-60.

Özel, N. (2013). A meta-theoretical approach to employee empowerment in the context of multidimensional theory searches: Conditionality approach to empowerment. International Journal of Management, Economics and Business, 9(18), pp. 215-238.

Öztürk, A.,ve Özdemir, F. (2003). Increasing job satisfaction based on employee empowerment in enterprises. Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 17(1-2), pp. 189-202.

Öztürk, İ. H. (2011). A theoretical study on the subject of teacher autonomy. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 10 (35), 82-99.

Parlar, H. (2012). A study on the determination of how willing and ready private school owners and senior managers are to create an empowered business environment in private schools. Istanbul Commerce University Journal of Social Sciences, 21(1).127-146.

Paul, R. J., Niehoff, B. R. ve Turnley, W. H. (2000). Empowerment, expectations, and the psychological contract—managing the dilemmas and gaining the advantages. Journal of Socio-Economics, 29, pp. 471-485.

Pont, B., Nusche, D., & Hopkins, D. (2012). Improving school leadership. Volume 2: Case Studies on Systems Leadership. OECD: Paris.

Raub, S.,& Robert, C. (2012). Empowerment, organizational commitment, and voice behavior in the hospitality ındustry: Evidence from a multinational sample. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 54(2), pp. 136-148.

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2013). Organizational behavior. Pearson Education Limited: England.

Robinson, S. L., & Rousseau, D. M. (1994). Violating the psychological contract: Not the exception but the norm. Journal of Organizational Behavior,15, pp. 245-259.

Rodrigues, C.A. (1994). Employee participation and empowerment programs. Empowerment in Organizations, 2(2), 29 – 40.

Rong, W. (2009). Management of College and University Teachers Based on Psychological Contract. Erişim tarihi:, Erişim Tarihi: 23.04.2020.

Rothstein, L. R. (1995). The empowerment effort that came undone. Harward Business Review, 73 (1)., Erişim Tarihi: 23.04.2020.

Rousseau, D. M. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organisations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2 (2), pp. 121-139.

Rousseau, D. M. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. London: Sage Publications.

Rousseau, D. M. ve Schalk, R. (2000). Psychological contracts in employment: Cross national perspectives. Sage Publications, Inc.: USA.

Rousseau, D. M., Tijoriwala, S. A. (1998). Assessing psychological contract: Issues, alternatives and measures. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, pp. 679-695.

Schein, E. H. (1965). Organizational psychology. Printice-Hall: Engelewood Cliffs, N. J.

Tabachnick, B. G. ve Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson.

Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An ‘interpretive’ model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15, pp. 666–681.

Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Yılmaz, K. ve Altınkurt, Y. (2012). Psychological contracts of private tutoring teachers. Electronic Journal of Educational Sciences, 1 (2), pp. 11-22.

Yukl, G. A., & Becker, W. S. (2006). Effective empowerment in organizations. Organization Management Journal, 3(3), 210-231.

Yüksel, Ö. ve Erkutlu, E. (2003 Empowering staff. Journal of Gazi University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 5(1), pp. 131-142.




How to Cite

Gokyer, N., Okay, İlkay, Okay, B., & Gokyer, U. (2023). The Relationship between Teachers’ Perceptions of Compliance with the Psychological Contract and School Administrators’ Empowering Leadership Behaviors. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 10(2), 395–410.