AI-Facilitated Self-Directed Learning and Mathematics Performance: A Mixed-Methods Study on ChatGPT Use among Generation Z Students
Abstract views: 0
/ 
PDF downloads: 0
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52380/ijcer.2026.13.1.822Keywords:
Self-directed Learning, ChatGPT, Generation Z, Mathematics Education, AI in Education, Mixed-MethodsAbstract
The rapid adoption of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools such as ChatGPT has raised important questions about how AI-supported learning relates to students’ self-directed learning (SDL) and mathematics achievement, particularly among Generation Z learners. This study examined the relationship between AI-facilitated SDL and mathematics performance using a convergent mixed-methods design among junior high school students in accredited public schools in the Philippines. A total of 272 Grade 7–10 students completed the Self-Rating Scale of Self-Directed Learning (SRSSDL) and an AI/ChatGPT Use and Engagement questionnaire, and their responses were linked to standardized mathematics assessment scores. In addition, 73 students participated in focus group discussions to describe how they used ChatGPT for mathematics learning. Quantitative results showed that most students demonstrated moderate SDL readiness (47.79%), while 29.41% exhibited high SDL and 22.79% showed low SDL. SRSSDL scores were strongly and positively correlated with mathematics performance (r = .849, p < .001), whereas ChatGPT usage showed a weak but significant positive correlation with performance (r = .227, p < .001). SRSSDL and ChatGPT usage were not significantly related (r = .080, p = .187). Multiple regression indicated that SDL readiness and ChatGPT usage significantly predicted mathematics performance (R² = .746), with SDL emerging as the dominant predictor (β = .836, p < .001) and ChatGPT usage contributing a smaller but significant effect (β = .159, p < .001). Qualitative thematic analysis yielded three themes: (1) Personalized support and motivation, (2) Challenges in critical thinking and overreliance, and (3) ChatGPT as a learning companion, indicating that the benefits of ChatGPT depend on how intentionally and critically it is used. Integrated findings suggest that while ChatGPT may provide supplementary support, SDL readiness remains the primary driver of mathematics achievement, and responsible AI use practices are necessary to minimize risks such as overreliance and reduced independent reasoning.
References
Ali, M. S. B., Yasmeen, R., & Munawar, Z. (2023). The Impact of Technology Integration on Student Engagement and Achievement in Mathematics Education: A Systematic Review. International journal of computer integrated manufacturing, 6(3), 222-232.
Anderson, M., & Anderson, M. (2024, April 14). Teens, Social Media and Technology 2018. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2018/05/31/teens-social-media-technology-2018
Anderson, M., & Jiang, J. (2018). Teens, social media & technology 2018. Pew research center, 31(2018), 1673-1689.
Banitt, J., Theis, S., & Van Leeuwe, L. (2013). The effects of technology integration on student engagement.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Byeon, S., & Kim, N. (2020). Impact of Korean students’ individual learning time on math performance: differential effect of teachers’ assessment competency. Asia Pacific Education Review, 21(4), 601-613.
Cadorin, L., Bortoluzzi, G., & Palese, A. (2013). The Self-Rating Scale of Self-Directed Learning (SRSSDL): A factor analysis of the Italian version. Nurse Education Today, 33(12), 1511–1516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.04.010
Cadorin, L., Suter, N., Saiani, L., Naskar Williamson, S., & Palese, A. (2011). Self-Rating Scale of Self-Directed Learning (SRSSDL): preliminary results from the Italian validation process. Journal of Research in Nursing, 16(4), 363-373.
Darmayanti, R. (2024). Programmed learning in mathematics education before and after the pandemic: Academics Integrate technology. Assyfa Learning Journal, 2(1), 40-56.
Foster, N., & Schleicher, A. (2022). Assessing creative skills. Creative Education, 13(1), 1-29.
Gabrielova, K., & Buchko, A. A. (2021). Here comes Generation Z: Millennials as managers. Business Horizons, 64(4), 489-499.
Geiger, A. (2025, April 24). Defining generations: Where Millennials end and Generation Z begins. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2019/01/17/where-millennials-end-and-generation-z-begins/
Guidance for generative AI in education and research. (2026, January 16). UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/guidance-generative-ai-education-and-research
Harry, A. (2023). Role of AI in Education. Interdiciplinary Journal and Hummanity (INJURITY), 2(3), 260-268.
How, A., & Hung, I. (2019). A reflection on the use of artificial intelligence tools for the meaningful learning of mathematics. Pythagoras, 40(1), Article 831. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/pythagoras.v40i1.831
Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning. New York, NY: Associated Press.
Lee, C. S., Osop, H., Kelni, G., & Goh, D. H. L. (2015). Investigating the use of YouTube as a self-directed learning platform. RB Allen et al, 308-310.
Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson.
Maskar, S., Herman, T., Dasari, D., & Puspaningtyas, N. D. (2023). Creativity in Mathematics: Mathematical Reasoning Ability of Indonesian Students and Solution Recommendation. Acta Scientiae, 25(5), 303-331. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.7813
Munaye, Y. Y., Admass, W., Belayneh, Y., Molla, A., & Asmare, M. (2025). ChatGPT in Education: A Systematic Review on opportunities, challenges, and future directions. Algorithms, 18(6), 352. https://doi.org/10.3390/a18060352
Ní Shé, C., Ní Fhloinn, E., & Mac an Bhaird, C. (2023). Student engagement with technology-enhanced resources in mathematics in higher education: A review. Mathematics, 11(3), 787.
OECD (2023), PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en.
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What students know and can do. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Orbeta, A. C., & Paqueo, V. B. (2022). Philippine education: Situationer, challenges, and ways forward (No. 2022-23). PIDS Discussion Paper Series.
Ornedo, J. M. (2020, December 10). Philippines lowest out of 58 countries in 4th-grade math, science —int’l study. GMA News Online. https://www.gmanetwork.com/news/topstories/nation/767542/philippines-lowest-out-of-58-countries-in-4th-grade-math-science-int-l-study/story
Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. (1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human factors, 39(2), 230-253. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872097778543886
Piaget, J. (1950). The psychology of intelligence (M. Piercy & D. E. Berlyne, Trans.). Routledge & Kegan Paul.
PISA 2022 Results (Volume I). (2023, December). https://www.oecd.org/. Retrieved February 22, 2026, from https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-2022-results-volume-i_53f23881-en/full-report.html?
Pousson, J., & Myers, K. (2018). Ignatian Pedagogy as a Frame for Universal Design in College: Meeting Learning Needs of Generation Z. Education Sciences, 8(4), 193. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8040193
Puppart, B., & Aru, J. (2025). Short-term AI literacy intervention does not reduce over-reliance on incorrect ChatGPT recommendations. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2503.10556
Shatto, B., & Erwin, K. (2016). Moving on from millennials: Preparing for generation Z. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 47(6), 253-254.
Singh, E., Vasishta, P., & Singla, A. (2024). AI-enhanced education: exploring the impact of AI literacy on generation Z’s academic performance in Northern India. Quality Assurance in Education.
Trocado, A., dos Santos, J. M., Saimon, M., & Lavicza, Z. (2026). Learning Quadratic Functions with ChatGPT: An Innovative Experience in High School Mathematics Education. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 14(1), 296-314.https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.5074
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds. & Trans.). Harvard University Press.
Williamson, S. N. (2007). Development of a self-rating scale of self-directed learning. Nurse Researcher, 14(2), 66–83. http://doi.org/10.7748/nr2007.01.14.2.66.c6022
Yoo, J. (2024). Self-directed Learning Ability and Shadow Education Expenditures: A Comparison of Impact on Student Achievement in Korea During COVID-19. SAGE Open, 14(2), 21582440241245206.
Zreik, M. (2024). Redefining mathematics education in the age of artificial intelligence: Challenges and opportunities. Impacts of globalization and innovation in mathematics education, 19-40.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jhoname Besas, Louida Patac, Adriano Patac Jr.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
