Teacher Observation Skills Scale: Validity and Reliability
Abstract views: 73
/ 
PDF downloads: 29
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52380/ijcer.2024.11.3.692Keywords:
Observation, observation skill, teacher, scale developmentAbstract
The present research aims to develop a valid and reliable instrument to measure teacher observation skills. The research was conducted during the 2023-2024 academic year with a total of 648 teachers. Data were collected through online survey methods. Expert opinion was consulted for the content and face validity of the scale in the research. Exploratory (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor (CFA) analyses were performed to assess the construct validity of the scale. Based on the results, it was found that the scale had a structure consisting of two dimensions and 18 items. It was determined that the factor loadings of the items in the scale were between .70 and .93. Considering the relevant literature, it was decided to name these dimensions as "natural observation skill" (NOS) and "scientific observation skill" (SOS). The Cronbach Alpha for the scales were both .95. As a result of the research, a valid and reliable scale that can determine the level of teachers' observation skills was developed.
References
Abruscato, J. (2000). Teaching children science: A discovery approach, 5th ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Akdeniz, A. R. (2006). Problem çözme, bilimsel süreç ve proje yönteminin fen eğitiminde kullanımı. S. Çepni (Ed.). Kuramdan uygulamaya fen ve teknoloji öğretimi içinde (5.baskı, s.107- 133) [The use of problem solving, scientific process and project method in science education. S. Çepni (Ed.). In Science and technology teaching from theory to practice (5th edition, pp.107- 133). Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
Anagün, Ş. S. & Yaşar, Ş. (2009). Developing scientific process skills at Science and Technology course in fifth grade students. İlköğretim Online, 8(3), 843 -865
Arslan, A. & Tertemiz, N. (2004). İlköğretimde bilimsel süreç becerilerinin geliştirilmesi [Development of scientific process skills in primary education]. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(4), 479-492.
Aydoğdu, B. (2014). Bilimsel süreç becerileri. Ş. S. Anagün ve Duban, N. (Ed.), Fen bilimleri öğretimi içinde (ss. 87- 113) [Scientific process skills. In S. S. Anagün and Duban, N. (Eds.) Science teaching (pp. 87- 113). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
Bahçeci, F. (2018). Grupla öğretim teknikleri, Gömleksiz, N. (Ed.), Öğretim ilke ve yöntemleri içinde (ss. 143-181) [Group teaching techniques, In Gömleksiz, N. (Ed.) Teaching principles and methods (pp. 143-181). Ankara: Asos Yayınları.
Bailey, K. D. (1994). Methods of social research. The Free Press, New York.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood cliffs, NJ: Prentice-hall.
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı [Manual of data analysis for social sciences] Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz Ş. & Demirel F. (2013). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods]. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayınları.
Cansız, N. & Cansız, M. (2018). Enhancing preservice teachers’ observation and inference skills. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 19(3), 362-373. doi: 10.17679/inuefd.335762.
Chalmers, A. F. 2010. What is this thing called science? Trans. Hüsamettin Arslan. 2nd ed. İstanbul: Paradigma.
Costello, A. B. & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1-9.
Crocker, L. & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
Cuthrell, K., Steadman S. C., Stapleton, J. & Hodge E. (2016). Developing expertise: Using video to hone teacher candidates’classroom observation skills. The New Educator 12(1), 5–27 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1547688X.2015.1113349
Çepni, S. & Çil, E. (2012). Fen ve teknoloji programı ilköğretim 1. ve 2. kademe öğretmen el kitabı[Science and technology program primary school 1st and 2nd grade teacher handbook] Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
De Vellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Ekici, F., Ekici, E., Ekici, F. T. & Kara, İ. (2012). Öğretmenlere yönelik bilişim teknolojileri öz-yeterlik algısı ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Validity and reliability study of ICT self-efficacy perception scale for teachers]. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 31(31), 53-65.
Erden, M. (2011). Eğitim bilimlerine giriş [Introduction to educational sciences]. Ankara: Arkadaş Yayınevi.
Ergin, Ö., Şahin Pekmez, E. & Öngel Erdal, S. (2005). Kuramdan uygulamaya deney yoluyla fen öğretimi [Teaching science through experimentation from theory to practice] . İzmir: Dinazor Kitapevi.
Ferguson, E. & Cox, T. (1993). Exploratory factor analysis: A users’ guide. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 1, 84-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.1993.tb00092.x
Gorsuch, R. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Harlen, W. & Jelly, S. (1989) Devoloping science in the primary classroom. London.
İğde, H. & Yakar, L. (2022). A study of reliability, validity and development of the teacher expectation scale. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 9(3), 787-807. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.976585
Johnson, K. 2014. Creative connecting: Early childhood nature journaling sparks wonder and develops ecological literacy. International Journal of Early Childhood Environmental Education, 2(1), 126–39.
Karakoç F.Y. & Dönmez L. (2014). Basic principles of scale development. Tıp Eğitim Dünyası, 13(40), 39-4.
Karakütük, K., Aksoy, H. & Akçay, R. C. (1994). Eğitim yönetiminde değerlendirme süreci [Evaluation process in education management]. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences (JFES), 27(1) , 361-383. doi: 10.1501/Egifak_0000000426
Karamustafaoğlu, S. (2011). Improving the science process skills ability of science student teachers using Idiagrams. Eurasian Journal of Physics and Chemistry, 3(1), 26-38.
Karslı, F., Yaman, F. & Ayas, A. (2010). Prospective chemistry teachers’ competency of evaluation of chemical experiments in terms of science process skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 778–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.101
Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831–879). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Maral, S., Unver, A. O. & Yürümezoğlu, K. (2012). An activity-based study on providing basic knowledge and skills of measurement in teaching. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice 12(1): 558–63.
Martin, D. J. (2003). Elementary science methods: A constructivist aproach (3rded.). USA: Thomson Publishing Company.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research a guide to design and implementation. Jossey Bass.
Ministry of Education (2018). Sosyal bilgiler dersi öğretim programı (İlkokul ve Ortaokul 4, 5, 6 ve 7. Sınıflar) [Social studies course curriculum (Primary and Secondary School 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th Grades)]. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Yayınları.
Nunnally, J. & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Poulson, D. Ashby, M. & Richardson, S. (1996). Userfit : A practical handbook on user-centred design for assistive technology. TIDE EC-DG XIII, ECSC-ECEAEC, Brussels-Luxembourg.
Ramig, J. E., Bailer, J. & Ramsey, M. J. (1995). Teaching science process skills. Torrance, California: Good Apple.
Rillero, P. (2010). Process skills and content knowledge. Science Activities, 35(3), 3–4.
Schwartz, S. R. & Lederman, N. G. (2008). What scientists say: Scientists’ views of nature of science and relation to science context. International Journal of Science Education 30(6). 727–771.
Smith, M. U. & Scharmann, L. C. (1999). Defining versus describing the nature of Science: A pragmatic analyses for classroom teachers and science educators. Science Education, 83(4), 493-509,
Şahin, M. G. & Boztunç Öztürk, N. (2018). Eğitim alanında ölçek geliştirme süreci: Bir içerik analizi çalışması [Scale development process in educational field: A content analysis research]. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 26(1), 191-199. doi:10.24106/kefdergi.375863
Şeker, H. & Gençdoğan, B. (2014). Psikolojide ve eğitimde ölçme aracı geliştirme [Developing measurement tools in psychology and education] (2. Basım). Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
Şencan, H. (2005). Sosyal ve davranışsal ölçümlerde güvenilirlik ve geçerlilik [Reliability and validity in social and behavioral measures]. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
Taşkın, Ç. & Akat, Ö. (2010). Araştırma yöntemlerinde yapısal eşitlik modelleme [Structural equation modeling in research methods]. Bursa: Ekin Yayınevi
Tavşancıl, E. (2005). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi [Measurement of attitudes and data analysis with SPSS]. Ankara: Nobel Yayınları.
Taze Karaçalı, H. (2021). Place of observation skill in 5. grade social studies textbooks. Review of International Geographical Education (RIGEO), 11(1), 100-117. doi: 10.33403rigeo.840610.
Tezbaşaran, A. (1997). Likert tipi ölçek hazırlama kılavuzu [Likert-type scale preparation guide]. Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derneği.
Tok, T. N. (2023). Etkili öğretim için yöntem ve teknikler. Doğanay, A. (Ed.) Öğretim ilke ve yöntemleri içinde (ss. 176-252) [Methods and techniques for effective teaching. In Doğanay, A. (Ed.) Teaching principles and methods (pp. 176-252)] Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayınları.
Türk Dil Kurumu (2023). Türk Dil Kurumu sözlüğü [Turkish Language Association dictionary]. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.
Worthington, R. L. & Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 806-838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006288127.
Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2011). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
Young, T. & Bender-Slack, D. (2011). Scaffolding pre-service teachers' observations: Eye on the future. Teaching Education, 22(3), 325- 337.
Yürümezoğlu, K. & Öztaş Cin, M. (2019) Developing children’s observation skills using a fractal pattern from nature, Science Activities, 56(2), 63-73, doi: 10.1080/00368121.2019.
Yürümezoğlu, K. (2015). Bilimin doğası ve gözlem, Yenice, N., Ed. Bilimin doğası gelişimi ve öğretimi içinde [Nature of science and observation, In Yenice, N. (Ed). Nature of science development and teaching. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Abdullah Cetin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
